76 user reviews
5.6
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
9.7 3 |
8.8 5 |
7 4 |
4.7 12 |
3.5 13 |
4.2 4 |
5.5 42 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
7.5 2 |
6.7 7 |
7.2 6 |
6 7 |
4.5 4 |
6.5 28 |
| Total: Votes: |
9.7 3 |
8.4 7 |
6.8 11 |
5.6 18 |
4 25 |
4.3 9 |
5.6 76 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 76)
I had watched this 2010 movie after the first one from 2008. It's odd to have a remake in such close a time frame; but, in the world of North Americanizing movies from England I guess even a bit of money is good in bad times. The original 2008 is much better if you have a choice and the story line is the same which makes the 2010 movie a darker version of the the same thing. Over all a good story.
5/10
pml008@ - 22 reviews
8.12.2010 - age: 36-49
Very funny. My kids loved it too. Would definitely buy this movie. Worth seeing again.
7/10
grants6@ - 3 reviews
1.7.2010 - age: 36-49
The movie was hilarious. Once they lock the midget up it gets even better than it already could be. Must watch. Sooo funny, my whole family agrees.
9/10
fantasyitalia16@ - first review
29.6.2010 - age: 13-17
I thouth this was an excellent film, it was funny and just simply amazing.
10/10
rochellegillespie@ - 7 reviews
20.6.2010 - age: 18-25
It had a some (like maybe 3 or so) funny moments but I wished I would have spent my money on another movie instead or stayed home watching a rental.
4/10
peterm55@ - 20 reviews
28.5.2010 - age: 50+
What is wrong with you people? This movie was halarious! And especialy with those funny moments! Great movie! =)
10/10
marcr103@ - 39 reviews
23.5.2010 - age: 1-12
What a waste of money... that is all I can say... I fell asleep part way thru the movie.
1/10
lorbos@ - 19 reviews
19.5.2010 - age: 36-49
The UK version is far better (on DVD) It is a British farce and does not translate well.
3/10
moo_car@ - 18 reviews
15.5.2010 - age: 36-49
Don't waste your money on this version. The British version is way better.
3/10
adamw@ - first review
9.5.2010 - age: 36-49
Wait for the DVD and do not expect too much. I tried to enjoy it but couldn't. I am being generous by giving this movie a 4 out of 10.
4/10
vlindsay1962@ - 14 reviews
9.5.2010 - age: 36-49
This is GAWD AWFUL!!! Stay away like the plague. What a ripoff... shame on Hollywood for taking advantage of the movie-going public who went bcuz they saw Chris Rock in the credits.
3/10
dubaidoubledoc@ - 12 reviews
9.5.2010 - age: 36-49
Boring and really not funny at all... I thought it would be a good one... the cast looked amazing!!.. what a dud.
4/10
jeffk29@ - 22 reviews
7.5.2010 - age: 36-49
This is sooo bad. It's too bad I couldn't get my hard earned money back. This is not even funny enough to rent on dvd when it comes out. A TOTAL BOMB!!!
2/10
toothdoc2000@ - 13 reviews
7.5.2010 - age: 50+
Hater! Haters! Haters! Chris Rock is a great black actor/comedian, love it or hate, it doesn't matter. I can see that some people are just haters. Can you do what they do; no so why hate these actors. They acted what was written. We are just in the theatre to watch, so watch and say thank you. Love me or hate me, do I care?
10/10
nkoli@ - first review
6.5.2010 - age: 26-35 - 2 replies
Garbage total Garbage! I can't believe how desperate these actors must have been to act in such a piece of thrash... the theater was full, but no one was laughing their heads off, except for one woman, who must've tipped back a few before going!!!
2/10
mjdallaire@ - 5 reviews
4.5.2010 - age: 36-49
One of the best comedy of all times. I really laugh to death! What a good combination of commedians! I've never laughed and seen such a very hilarious movie. The movie goers are laughing like syncronized symphony orchestra, like waves of laughs inside the movie house! Great comedy movie! I strongly recommended to my friends to see this movie and they did! We all really laugh to death!
9/10
joaiman@ - first review
4.5.2010
Okay there, the new version is WaaaYY better then the original version... sure they remade it, but not with british accents.. don't hate!
10/10
jenna_bk@ - 10 reviews
4.5.2010 - age: 18-25
Oh, come on people 1/10... 2/10... seriously? After I've read all these reviews I almost changed my mind, but I'm glad I didn't. Some of the moments were just hilarious!! I haven't laughed that hard in a long time. Everybody in the audience were overwhelmed by the laughter!
7/10
kat220786@ - first review
2.5.2010 - age: 18-25 - One reply
I thought the movie was hilarious... Oscar had me laughing the entire time... I havent seen the original... and honestly, I dont really care to. People who gave this movie a 1 need to re-examine thier own sense of humor.
8/10
bdw3983@ - first review
2.5.2010 - age: 26-35
Why would they remake such a great British comedy only 5 years after the original? What a waste of time and money!! Please rent the original!! You could not pay me to see this garbage again!
1/10
tlheggerud@ - 23 reviews
30.4.2010 - age: 36-49
Just rent the British version. The original one is really funny. I still can't understand why Hollywood decided to remake a movie that is only what, 5 years old, and is in English already. They even used the same little man from the original! Chris Rock should stick with minor parts in movies and/or stand up comedy.
1/10
tvmosnz@ - first review
30.4.2010 - age: 26-35
Wow... where to begin... They were some laugh but the movie not worth a full price admission. Not the worst movie out there but I've better...
5/10
sentenza99@ - 516 reviews
28.4.2010 - age: 26-35
Wasn't a bad movie. Had it's funny moments for sure. Danny Glover is awesome as a grumpy old man!!!
6/10
sag_74_557@ - 85 reviews
27.4.2010 - age: 26-35
I can't believe they chose to remake this movie, save your money and rent the original.
1/10
missamyford@ - first review
26.4.2010 - age: 26-35
This is not funny at all. I don't laugh at stunts and jokes done in very poor taste. This is a very poor film as others have said.
2/10
essiejustleft@ - 9 reviews
26.4.2010 - age: 50+
I like the original British version much more than this one!!!
5/10
rodster@ - first review
25.4.2010 - age: 26-35
I thought the movie was okay, considering the macabre movie plot. I was NOT in constant belly laughs, but there were a few good one-liners and comedic episodes where someone is accidentally given physio-mind-altering drugs.
6/10
kellygoesdown@ - first review
25.4.2010 - age: 36-49
I Wish! It should have been the death of the movie before it was made. I thought it may have been ok but now I wish I could sue the producers for my price of admission. Life would have been better if this was just shelved and left as a bad idea instead of being made.
2/10
fwcopper@ - 7 reviews
25.4.2010 - age: 36-49
This is one of those films for a light laughter. Chris Rock plays his character very nicely, so does Martin Lawrence, I enjoyed Danny Glover more than his care taker. All in all, it was time well spent for a light comedic picture, begins and ends in one place, easy to follow and track the characters.
10/10
itsme-baby@ - 17 reviews
24.4.2010 - age: 36-49
A lot of awkward parts made the movie kinda stupid but all in all it was funny. It was OK!!
6/10
monopoly2000@ - 17 reviews
24.4.2010 - age: 13-17
This movie was hilarious, the whole theater was in stitches. I don't understand the low rating.
8/10
wpasieka@ - first review
24.4.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply
This is mostly a snooze fest. There are a few funny lines but no more. The trailer was funnier and shorter.
3/10
benjustleft@ - 11 reviews
23.4.2010 - age: 36-49
If you're in the mood to laugh or you'd like to be in the mood to laugh - then see this movie. I didn't know what to expect but Chris Rock and Martin Lawrence in a movie should have told me. This is not a movie that will show great insights into the problems of the world but after a good laugh you may come up with some of your own.
7/10
dcosmob@ - 63 reviews
23.4.2010 - age: 50+
Remake or no remake this movie is bad no matter how you slice it. What's with some of these black comedies? It is better than "little man", another terrible black comedy but other than that! COME ON Chris Rock get it together, you're much funnier than this!
1/10
michjulien@ - 139 reviews
22.4.2010 - age: 36-49
Not worth it waste of money waste of time big names but stupid movie the movie was made in one single house, it looks like they were saving money.
1/10
essam954@ - first review
22.4.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply
Veeery veeery funny movie I love it and I will go see again.
10/10
nabil_wil@ - first review
22.4.2010 - age: 26-35
I dont know what people are talking about this movie was so funny Chris Rock and James Marsden made this movie great.
8/10
lil_shorty_69er@ - 357 reviews
22.4.2010 - age: 18-25
A couple funny moments at best. Much of the cast are funny in their respective stand up routines but this movie lacks the riotous mayhem it advertised. Save your money and your time.
3/10
paulleslie12@ - 345 reviews
22.4.2010 - age: 36-49
It made me laugh my ass off, 2wce (and I only whatched it once)!! :P
10/10
ultimate-boy@ - first review
21.4.2010 - age: 13-17
Does anyone else find it ironic that the only funny character in this 'black' comedy is the white guy? Truly a deadful undertaking, pun intended, I saw it on cheap Tuesday and still felt like my wallet was violated. Utter trash.
1/10
sirius2themax@ - 13 reviews
21.4.2010 - age: 26-35
OMG!! This movie made me laugh sooo much... I almost peed my pants! You should go see it!
8/10
x0xelsax0x@ - first review
21.4.2010 - age: 13-17
This should be titled Death at a Cinema; it is sooo bad. Feh!
1/10
marlenehochbaum@ - 65 reviews
21.4.2010 - age: 50+
This movie was hilarious I laughed from begining to the end. All actors are really funny and I think everyone one should see this movie , my bf and I were very happy of the ending!!
9/10
shakira_degree@ - 2 reviews
21.4.2010 - age: 18-25
With so few comedy movies made this year, this is just what we all needed. Some scenes are the funniest ever. Includes a plot totalling unexpected, and hilarious. Great date night movie to have a good laugh.
8/10
nancmcv@ - 11 reviews
21.4.2010 - age: 50+
Why they needed a remake of the original British movie directed by Frank Oz baffles the mind. Oz original was fresh, smart writing that subverted it's material with such a sacred occassion in any family's life. This new director made an unfunny by-the-numbers remake of a film that is still fresh in a lot of peoples mind. Chris Rock has never been funny and never will. A total waste of my time.
3/10
harry.georgatos@ - 82 reviews
20.4.2010 - age: 36-49
This movie was funny. Oscar is hilarious. Just thinking about some of the scenes, I'm laughing now. The actors made it enjoyable. But don't spend full price to see it. Either go on a cheaper night or rent it.
7/10
face_t@ - 15 reviews
20.4.2010 - age: 26-35
Note: The user reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-76]