








5.5| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
8 2 |
10 2 |
4 2 |
3.3 3 |
4 9 |
5.2 4 |
5 22 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
10 2 |
6 2 |
6 1 |
6 2 |
4.7 4 |
6.3 12 |
| Total: Votes: |
8 2 |
10 4 |
5 4 |
4.4 5 |
4.7 12 |
5 8 |
5.5 37 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Welll... the acting wasn't too bad. And there was a lot of action. If you like the actors and you like pure action movies and you don't mind that there's not much of a plot (I didn't say NO plot), then you'll probably find this one entertaining.
5/10
mutantq@ - 17 reviews
21.3.2010 - age: 36-49
This is GAWD awful. A snooze-fest. At least the popcorn was good.
2/10
jilljustleft@ - 196 reviews
1.2.2010 - age: 18-25
Bad script, predictable story, plot and ending. I actually nodded off a few times during the film... A true DUD. This is not even worth renting on dvd when it comes out unless you want to waste a few bucks.
1/10
joeljustleft@ - 174 reviews
1.2.2010 - age: 26-35
Nothing special. The plan was pretty lame and the ending was predictable. A shame considering the talent available.
5/10
parker_2@ - 244 reviews
12.1.2010 - age: 36-49
I shook my head in this movie more times in disbelief that someone actually believed it should have been made, than the fact I was sitting in the theatre watching it. Pitiful.
3/10
deezledubb@ - 9 reviews
12.1.2010 - age: 36-49
Not bad. I enjoyed watching it. If you enjoy a good suspense, you will probably like it.
7/10
lucie_160@ - 35 reviews
26.12.2009 - age: 50+
A total waste of a very good cast and a very big budget. The potential of the story never materialized. What a disappointment. Whatever the producers were going for never made it to the screen.
3/10
carolfclarke@ - 10 reviews
24.12.2009 - age: 50+
This movie was awesome. My friend and I loved it! It was full of suspense and things were so unexpected.
10/10
gabyrose95@ - 14 reviews
23.12.2009 - age: 13-17
Best movie i've ever seen!!! All the other reviews are confusing to me, the plot was maybe a 9 out of 10 but still the best movie!!!
10/10
thelifeofmusic@ - first review
19.12.2009 - age: 13-17
Seriously waste of time and waste of money, how could you do a movie soo simple with no real plot... Not even a single woman in there... I do not recommend it at all...
1/10
millionairemtl@ - first review
16.12.2009 - age: 26-35
The idea wasnt very original. But the plan was good to go to omg plan got worse fast. It seemed to me they were killing themselves off. The plan did not execute. But ended a bit surprising.
7/10
brandy020100@ - 16 reviews
15.12.2009 - age: 36-49
It was just an ok movie for me, nothing was very out of ordinary.
6/10
mariette.robichaud@ - 255 reviews
14.12.2009 - age: 50+
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I was waiing for this movie as we could see the previews as of last summer... big names. THIS MOVIE IS A REAL PIECE A CRAP. Not even good to rent... unless you are so bored and you have 90 minutes to waste Seems it is a low budget movie were the movie takes place in one SINGLE PLACE... an industrial abandonned building. The storyline is very bad. 5 guys agree to rob 42 million dollars they are transporting with no plan and it goes wrong right on the get go...
3/10
cyberguerrier@ - first review
13.12.2009 - age: 36-49
Based on all the reviews I was really scared to go to this one. Took a chance and was pleasantly surprised. Not so sure how this one was rated anything below a 6... oh well to each their own. Maybe they need to see a few more movies that ARE real bad. While the plot did have it's holes, so what? I enjoyed this one for what it was worth.
7/10
drs.@ - 160 reviews
12.12.2009 - age: 36-49
The worst movie I have seen in a long time. The plot was not carefully thought out at all. I only reason I stayed until the end was that I kept hoping there would be a good final scene. I was thoroughly disappointed.
1/10
danielbosscher@ - first review
12.12.2009
Not the greatest movie I'ver ever seen some action, and a few laughs. The acting and story is what makes this ok and not great.
7/10
bmubersoldat52@ - 39 reviews
12.12.2009 - age: 18-25
Not entertaining, plot was simple, character development was poor, directing was uninspiring, editting was decent during parts of the driving scenes but mostly annoying cuts. No romantic development at all. I enjoy complicated heist movies but this movie was simple and boring.
3/10
czinkota@ - 34 reviews
11.12.2009 - age: 50+
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Sorry but I will be giving up some of the storyline in this review... but seriously there is no credible story anyway. Surely even the actors must take some ownership for their part in this movie. After reading the script didn't any of them say," Hey this is dumb because..." or "Wouldn't it be better if I said this..."? The second half action is reasonable and the acting throughout is good but that is about the only positives that I can say. So don't read any further as I will divulge some of the story. The lead character is asked, THE NIGHT BEFORE the robbery.."Hey when you come to work tomorrow we are stealing 42 Million dollars... are you in? " Don't worry about how and certainly don't worry about the details... and don't worry about the fact that our trucks all have tracking devices embedded in them... in fact don't worry about the audience because they are as dumb as we are... And the climax is equally profound... The bad guy is chasing the good guy with an armored truck... the good guy simply keeps running on the only road in sight... hmmm... A five year old could write a better script, or minimally improve this dreadful effort.
3/10
psterl3384@ - 102 reviews
11.12.2009 - age: 36-49
Do you ever wonder what an armored car demolition derby would be like? If so, SEE THIS MOVIE! Otherwise, save your money!
3/10
a7b84008@ - first review
11.12.2009 - age: 50+
I am still amazed that during the screenwriting, acting, filming, editing that someone actually thought this was going to be a good movie! Seriously did we just give up on good storytelling?
3/10
mnyakas@ - first review
9.12.2009 - age: 36-49
Kind of funky moral overtones to this one about the planned robbery of over 40 million bucks by some guys who seem to be getting the shaft in their lives with no change in sight. I question the validity of turning a movie into a moral arguement about right and wrong when the characters in question have a bleak future ahead of them and nobody could really say for sure how things might have gone had they decided to just go with their original plan.
6/10
antarcticahighway@ - 2 reviews
8.12.2009 - age: 26-35
I haven't seen a crap like that for a while!!! I don't know wrote that this was a non stop action movie and gave 10/10!!! No story and the concept is equal to 0. The whole movie in few words: We're going to take the cash! What's the plan? We'll just take it!! WOW!!! If you like the men in uniforms go for it, there's not a single female in the movie. The only good part about it is that 20 minutes towards the end the sound disappeared for a few minutes so we got our money back.
1/10
gpsrs1@ - first review
8.12.2009 - age: 18-25
Good movie, action scenes were nicely done, worth seeing, the wife liked it also, great outing.
8/10
frac001@ - 12 reviews
7.12.2009 - age: 50+
AWFUL. Why would Damon and Fishburne associate with such a poor movie? The plot was softer than 3-ply toilet paper. AWFUL!
2/10
offthehosel@ - first review
7.12.2009 - age: 36-49 - One reply
The actors are great. Nice performance of Matt Dillon. The action is ok but some parts are non sense and illogical.
6/10
monicafia@ - 118 reviews
6.12.2009 - age: 26-35
Great action movie. Taking the money seemed to be a good plan but when it backfires, it takes a whole new twist. Fast paced action. Loved the scenes at the hideout.
8/10
metalandy2000@ - 54 reviews
5.12.2009 - age: 36-49
Good all around movie, imagine an action movie with a real script and decent acting... nice change. Good drama.
7/10
itishere@ - 153 reviews
5.12.2009 - age: 50+
A director with style, and a v good cast. Laurence Fishburne creates a memorable role. Starts very slow but builds much tension in second half. Massive Attack prominent in the score.
7/10
dgfcuk@ - 91 reviews
5.12.2009 - age: 36-49
Very good action movie. It has more to offer than what I expected from such a genre, as most action movies are more about adrenaline rushes than content. Plot lines and character motivation are well established and believable and it's even layered with some social commentary. Worth my money!
8/10
ovidius@ - 2 reviews
5.12.2009 - age: 26-35
This is one of the poorest movies that I have seen. It was totally unbelievable and boring. The timing of the movie is absurd. Stay at home and don't waste your money.
3/10
rickbrushett@ - 2 reviews
4.12.2009 - age: 50+
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
With this cast You would expect alot... DON'T! It is purely an action film with VERY little else. The whole thing with the homeless guy spotting them was so dumb. What does he expect and being a vet he has seen it all at war, so why does this matter to him so much. I thought he wanted to be there for his family? Oh don't bother!
3/10
michjulien@ - 139 reviews
4.12.2009 - age: 36-49 - 5 replies
A good thriller with plenty of non stop action--violent scenes, gun scenes, blood scenes that will keep you on the edge of your seat--good performance from all the cast!
7/10
vin.2000@ - 119 reviews
4.12.2009
Note: The user reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.