The Wolfman Movie Reviews

This movie had literally dozens of blueprints to follow, disect and re-invent. Yet, this film didn't stray too far from the original genre nor did it break any new ground. Today, the Wolfman still hasn't given us anything new to fear or marvel at. The potential for so much more was there but after 2 hours of watching this one, it was easily forgotten afterwards.

6/10
paulleslie12@ - 345 reviews
18.7.2010 - age: 36-49

This movie was great!!! Upon reading bad reviews I started watching the film expecting to get bored really fast. The boredom kept itself at bay!!! Benicio is a masterpeice as he usually is and he makes out for a great werewolf! I will definitely be buying this movie when it comes out on dvd and watching it that same night (twice maybe)!

8/10
jensnith1985@ - first review
20.6.2010 - age: 18-25

I don’t understand all the negative reviews. The movie was simple but entertaining. I actually thought the effects were good and the landscape was as dark, mysterious, and menacing as the creature himself. Anyone looking for an oscar worthy film should wake up and smell the Folgers. It’s The Wolfman people!

7/10
bradshawscott@ - 94 reviews
6.6.2010 - age: 26-35

Simply a remake of the old one. Was skeptical that could be awesome at all. The acting was convincing (Hugo Weaving and Anthony Hopkins deliver, as always. Benicio del Toro and Emily Blunt we're fine. Blunt never really has much expression in her face in anything she does. Was confused y del Toro at first, but then you understand he as put to grow up in the US) The lines were not cheesy 'cause really, the plotline was simple. On the whole, it added something more to the classic tale that made it still scary and awe-striking in todays cinema. The violence was brutal, quick and horrifying. Awesome fight scene at the end, a la "Hulk (2003)", but simpler and better. I was pleseantly surprised, and recommend this jewel to whoever knows the old tale of the Wolfman.

8/10
sydbie@ - 10 reviews
9.5.2010 - age: 18-25

Possible and probably the worst movie i've seen ever. The wolves were terrible, acting was bad, and it makes you worried how joe jonston (director) is going to do with captain america. ABSOLUTLY TERRIBLE.

1/10
dkmaster_admz@ - 27 reviews
5.4.2010 - age: 13-17

The script is horrible and the actors are even worse. Definitely a movie to forget.

2/10
francis.maisonneuve@ - 6 reviews
23.3.2010 - age: 18-25

It was a great movie. I got exactly what I wanted from this movie, a bit of mystery about how the Wolfman curse is given, and great special effects and dynamo ending. A good, simple, traditional monster movie!!!

8/10
frstevos@ - 4 reviews
19.3.2010 - age: 26-35

The directing was awful. The casting was awful. The script was awful. The acting was awful. The special effects were awful. Everything was awful, inconsistent and entirely disappointing.

1/10
dan_yell10@ - first review
17.3.2010

[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Why would you even put it in theatres? I admit the graphics are pretty cool but who wrote that script? And the actors aren't very good like when the wolfman gets shot by the woman, it seemed like as if nothing happened to him! Usually in movies when people are about to die they slowly start to lose their breath and slowly start to close their eyes, but in this movie the was talking normally as if it were some tea party and then he dies instantly like his head just drops to the in 2 seconds!

2/10
sasgirl@ - 2 reviews
15.3.2010 - age: 18-25

Don't listen to the negative reviews of this movie guys, it was a fun movie to watch with awesome special effects. Sure the storyline isn't profound, it's a monster movie, not an Oscar worthy drama. I'm just glad I didn't trust the reviews, you people that scored this movie so low should be ashamed of yourself, you almost stopped me from seeing a great, entertaining movie, most fun I've had in the theatre for a long time! Shame, shame on you hehe.

8/10
truemania@ - 13 reviews
13.3.2010 - age: 26-35

It should have gotten a way better rating than it did I'm confused it was awesome.

10/10
siesmic_serpent@ - first review
13.3.2010 - age: 13-17

Good!!! I love it. !!! It's a good story...

10/10
ntremblay7979@ - 3 reviews
13.3.2010 - age: 13-17

Only enjoyed it since I'll watch anything with Anthony Hopkins.

5/10
sweatjocky@ - 33 reviews
12.3.2010 - age: 26-35

This is the best movie ever!!! I love it!!! I think joe johnston and the rest of the gang should do a Wolfman 2 be cause this movie is so GREAT!!!

10/10
cooolgirl450@ - first review
12.3.2010 - age: 13-17

Despite the bad rap given by critics on this film, I have to say that I throughly enjoyed it. It's a wonderful recreation of an old 40's classic. While the story is not the exact one from the original, it's close enough to bear similarities. In fact, it's a better story this time around. I also agree that the acting was very good. Anthony Hopkins gave a strong performance playing the father and was his usual, mysterious self as we have come to expect from his many other roles. Of course Benicio Del Toro's performance was flawless. He manages to be a likable sympathetic character whose transformations seem incredibly painful. I was actually surprised how much he looked like Lon Chaney, Jr. in some scenes during the movie. As far as Toro's portrayal as the Wolfman I thought he pulled it off quite well. Of all the werewolf flicks I've seen over the years, I don't think I've seen a more menacing beast than in this one. The way in which he attacks his victims is instantaneous and surprisingly scary. There is a multitude of blood and carnage throughout, yet it never hovers on the gore long enough to take away from the atmosphere or pace. Besides that I found the special effects were genuinely convincing and exciting. I thought the vintage costumes and decor were truly authentic for this time period. Oh, and the scenery is great in this film too... the misty moors, lush landscapes, stage coaches passing beneath overcast skies, eerie haunting woods and so forth. I have to also say that the direction is pretty good in this production as well, and as for the visuals they were amazing. So, in closing I say, to all you werewolf and vampire fans, you don't want to miss this one.

8/10
crisperguy33@ - 85 reviews
7.3.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply

Probably had some value, but I didn't enjoy it. Wish I hadn't gone.

1/10
k.grant.wark@ - first review
5.3.2010 - age: 50+

The critics are to hard on the movie... It's not a masterpiece but the visual effect is quite nice, a lot of creativity, and very artistic.

7/10
mag_2_you@ - 3 reviews
5.3.2010 - age: 26-35

Wow. I'm embarassed to say I've been to see this.

2/10
rachel-lavigne@ - first review
4.3.2010 - age: 18-25 - 2 replies

I really enjoyed it. Very stylishly done in the tradition of the classic universal monster movies with a fresh updated storyline and effects. As a member of the Universal Monster Army I approve!

8/10
derbyshire67@ - first review
3.3.2010 - age: 36-49

It was a good classic remake movie. Worth seing just for the transformation part and seing Del Torro act all crazy and stuff...

7/10
anhtue@ - 8 reviews
3.3.2010 - age: 26-35

Finally, a film I want to see again the instant I stepped out of the theatre. With excellent acting and superb production values, this is a period piece that, ah, has bite. Puns aside, Wolfman is funny and nightmarish, beautiful and as savage and dark as the Victorian age it depicts. Unfortunately, this means that it expects the audience to keep up with it, a definite difference from most any other recent horror film. While it is certainly gory, at least there is a reason for rather realistic entrails being strewn--briefly--across the screen. However, this is a film that is not horrific so much for the creatures in it as the people. Animals cannot be cruel, only wild and violent: it's the humans who master the cruelty and evil, and display it without shame, or worse, comprehension. Wordiness aside, it's a good emotional escape, with love, betrayal, humour and blood all over the place. Go, have fun, and clap for the wolfman...

10/10
sympho_ny@ - first review
1.3.2010 - age: 18-25

Somehow this movie could have been better... maybe if Spielberg directed it! I suppose it's worth it if there's absolutely nothing else at the theater , I mean "nothing"... hence , the only thing playing lol! I enjoyed the popcorn.

5/10
dmstyres@ - 14 reviews
1.3.2010 - age: 36-49

It is worth seeing and had some scary parts in it. It will make you jump out your seat.

7/10
balnesjw@ - 93 reviews
1.3.2010 - age: 26-35

A nice homage to the Lon Chaney Jr. movie. Bernicio del Toro looks a lot like Lon Chaney and the monster looks remarkably similar to the monster in that movie. These attempts to recreate the feel of the original including the camera effects during the asylum torture sequence worked. The movie fell apart, as it does in way too many movies , is when the hero monster is forced to fight a better, badder version of himself, i.e. both Hulks, Iron Man etcetera. Even the best special effects is no match for such shoddy, short sighted story elements. Aside from that or, if that sort of thing doesn't bother you. You should enjoy this movie.

6/10
kramaj1ca@ - 52 reviews
27.2.2010 - age: 50+

The movie was ok, just ok. Not bad, not great. Was a little bit bored at some parts. Did not like the ending.

6/10
dimanta@ - 136 reviews
27.2.2010 - age: 26-35

Horrible. Cheezy, not worth the time or effort.

3/10
bvactank@ - 2 reviews
27.2.2010 - age: 36-49

The Wolfman is a remake of the classic Universal horror picture starring Lon Chaney. This newer version has it's moments. A nice metamorphic transformation scene courtesy of monster maker extraordinaire Rick Baker, this new version has a couple of plot twists the original 1940's film doesn't have. Great production values, solid acting and the director's eye for detail make this film a pretty good choice for a popcorn filled afternoon of nostalgic pleasure.

7/10
gnarleyharley@ - 45 reviews
27.2.2010 - age: 50+

For a horror movie I found it funny.

6/10
boo8jw@ - first review
27.2.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply

Worst movie ever. No story line so boring.

1/10
tyler_reynolds666@ - first review
26.2.2010 - age: 13-17 - One reply

I was dragged to go watch this movie... and honestly I thought it would be the worst thing i've ever seen. I was suprised it wasn't that terrible and this is me being nice. I did somewhat enjoy it but all in all it was still not a great movie. They have ruined another classic horror flick.

6/10
srsupafly@ - 8 reviews
25.2.2010 - age: 26-35

A NE PAS VOIR AU CINÉMA!!! Histoire tout croche, comédien mauvais même pour Anthony Hopkins, c'est assez dur mais ya réussit la dedans. La seule chose qui est bonne c'est les effets spéciaux sinon atrocement décevant!!!

2/10
nikigirl30@ - 2 reviews
25.2.2010 - age: 18-25

This movie is a turd! Not worth the price of a ticket. No story line and very predictable.

3/10
fpeaugh@ - 2 reviews
24.2.2010 - age: 36-49

I wasn't sure what to expect the person I went with was amazing but the movie wasn't wait for DVD.

5/10
sunmagicman@ - 22 reviews
24.2.2010 - age: 26-35

Wolfman is a very entertaining movie. Good story and good casting. The director exposes the Wolfman sparingly, and in doing so builds suspense. Worth the ticket price.

8/10
western2000ca@ - 2 reviews
23.2.2010 - age: 36-49

"You have done some terrible things, Lawrence... some very terrible things". I am a fan of the Universal horror movies of the 1930s and 40s and "The Wolfman" continues with this tradition with, of course, increasing the special effects and gore that today's audiences crave. I have always thought that Benicio Del Toro has a primitive, animalistic quality to him so he was particularly well-casted as the doomed creature. Anthony Hopkins is excellent as his grizzled father who hides a secret. The Victorian England cities and countryside are also depicted very realistically.

10/10
chester1958@ - 146 reviews
23.2.2010 - age: 50+

Decent movie, not a must see in the theater. As always Anthony Hopkins is Excellent, Hugo Weaving is also very good, although his character is not that well developed, the special effects are certainly no up to today's standards and the wolfman looks like this is a remake of a much older film all in all the plot is just not that exciting or original. There are some good performances and the scenery and costumes are excellent.

7/10
geoff_mtl@ - 5 reviews
22.2.2010 - age: 26-35 - 2 replies

I enjoyed it thoroughly. If you like classic horror/monster movies this is a very, very good film of that genre. Apparently it is a remake of the original (which I'd never seen so I didn't know what to expect) and is done surprisingly well. Wonderfully acted, great cinematography, and it really captures the feel of living during the Victorian era. With very good special effects, intense action and great suspense, I can't remember enjoying a movie this much over the last 2 years. I was totally surprised by this movie!! :D

10/10
easportrsrocks@ - first review
21.2.2010 - age: 36-49

I was expecting a lot more from this movie. I won't say it was bad but a lot of things were lacking, the story and the acting...

5/10
sentenza99@ - 516 reviews
21.2.2010 - age: 26-35

Fell asleep. Not good, even if you don't pay.

4/10
kghbkifvghjfg@ - first review
20.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Great film, non stop action and acting, Benicio Del Toro and Anthony Hopkins were excellent in this movie. I thought the ending could of been better. I have a feeling there's going to be a sequel. The story I thought was excellent with a good action sequence. If you're up to go see a horror film, this is good see.

8/10
matthewqchotmail.com@ - 9 reviews
20.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Good movie, worth seeing, not really much more to add. The plot was predictable, the acting was pathetic, the only real reason I liked it was because of Anthony Hopkins and the fact that it was about werewolves.

7/10
pink_flame7@ - 11 reviews
20.2.2010 - age: 18-25

[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
What was up with the acting and what exactly is the story? Jeez, I did not leave this movie feeling the way I thought I would. OK, he's a werewolf, he eats people, and then they torture him is an asylum. Way predictable, and the acting often made me cringe. I expected way more from these actors.

3/10
sweetchika08@ - 2 reviews
20.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Great cinamatography - a must see for adult movie fans. Not really a movie for teenagers!

8/10
dio4444@ - first review
20.2.2010 - age: 36-49

I'm giving this a 6 because it presented nothing new to the film industry not even half decent effects, this is a good friday night rental at best.

6/10
fallen_angel80@ - first review
20.2.2010 - age: 26-35

Should have been called Wolfmen. They did not need to go to London.

6/10
roy.mitton@ - 2 reviews
20.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Watch it, kinda boring but like a modern day 80s slasher film, lots of blood and gore.

7/10
brakebei@ - first review
20.2.2010 - age: 18-25

Hugo Weaving and Anthony Hopkins made this movie. The environments were also really well done, however the romance sub plot was terrible as was the design of the Wolfman. Average at best.

6/10
shadowhacker@ - 51 reviews
19.2.2010 - age: 18-25

Watching this movie, one learns a great deal about what makes a movie unwatchable -- it indeed it offends on a variety of levels. How did it get to be so bad? The primary answer is genre failure. The director attempts to evoke the atmosphere of early "monster film" cinematography -- one sees this across a range of cinematographic semiotemes in the film (the moon, the crypt, the mental asylum) Indeed, plot elements and narrative structure are evocative of earlier cinema. So it's a like if Ford reintroduced the Model T. Certainly there would be a few sales but then one would quickly learn that the car had no power and could not handle well on the road. In the same way, the image grammar of this film has long been deposed by new representations. Ten seconds of it would be okay, but two hours is just tiring. I literally fell asleep at one point, and that NEVER happens to me at the movies. On of the film's innovations is to try to give the epoch a post-modern flavor by introducing an hispanic character. This might have worked in a boring sort of way if the actor playing the role had been born in Engladn. Del Toro's Mexi-American roots betray him in this film, however. From the very first moment he begins to act in the film it is clear that this man has never before set foot in a moor. It seems as if DelToro knows that any acting he does will portray his inappropriateness in the role and he attempts to compensate by not acting at all. As a result, he seems more like a piece of furniture than a human being when he is on screen, and the fact that others on screen treat him as if he is human, is interacting with them, makes them appear a little affectively dissociated too. All in all it was a horrid film -- so bad I lack the literary ability to get my sentences down into the gutter where this thing discovered and created itself. Something this cliche, this pathetic, this ruined as a potential for cinema turned into nothing at all, such a thing comes along rarely in even a decade. It's as if Ed Wood had resurrected to do one more film with a better budget. I encourage all readers to go, because that is the only way they will get the full sense of cinematic ennui which my sentences can't come even close to creating.

7/10
basilherringboneiii@ - 113 reviews
19.2.2010 - age: 13-17 - 40 replies

Then why on earth would you give this flick a 7? You are writing one things and scoring it much higher than your descriptors reflect. I believe that you meant to score this a 5 or even a 4... You actually gave this movie a higher score than the average review in here. So explain it to me in 25 words or less.
psterl3384@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 36-49

As I say in the note, itself, some things are so bad that they compel viewing, in the manner people might gawk at a car accident. This movie is the car accident of cinema 2010. For a person interested in the logic of cinema, how it works and when it doesn't, this film is a gold mine. Keeping in mind that backers put millions of dollars into making it, and that it drew a stellar cast, it provides a wonderful illustration of the gap between conception and realization. Anyone interested in that issue would be fascinated to observe how a film, which must have been conceived in good faith, could actually turn out so horribly bad. I also encourage people to see bad films in order to cultivate the cinematic palatte, through exposure to the taste of offal. But, in another sense, in the sense of sending a message to a viewer seeking basic entertainment from the film in itself, this movie is a 0, perhaps a 1 or a 2 at best -- definitely not worth watching unless you can be reflexive with respect to entertainment, which I am at all times. The given score was, then, part of the irony of the evaluation. Sorry for the confusion.
basilherringboneiii@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 13-17

I see all the movies both good and bad. Like you I try to garner anything from the flick besides the plot and acting. But I disagree with you on the scoring. Some directors create car wrecks to create an effect or a mood. Sometimes it is to have you feel the frustration of the protagonist or the victim or whatever... You are saying that this movie's car wreck was unintentional and was just sadly bad... Anyway thanks for your response. I gave this puppie a 3 or 4. I enjoyed the setting but otherwise this movie couldn't make up its mind on many levels. If given a choice I would rather watch the original with Lon Chaney.
psterl3384@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 36-49

We perhaps are not worlds apart on this film, albeit we score it differently. Many of Tarantino's films are attempts to do what you are describing in this note -- also films like Sin City: to create a sort of "triumph of the B movie" by returning to a 50's genre and "sexing it up". In this case, I think the director was going much earlier into cinema -- shortly after talkies and in terms of images, sometimes even before talkies. There was a discursive awkwardness in those early movies -- though actors could perform stage drama with text, representation of discourse in cinema was new. The awkward speaker, who comes in two seconds after his cue, in a manner that dissociates utterances from responses, was part of that early form. Perhaps DelToro was trying to do that or the director was trying to create that. At any event, I don't think it worked. If it had, we would both be rating this film higher. At any event, thanks for your provocative and challenging insights.
basilherringboneiii@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Are you really only 13 to 17 years old? Bravo critique, whatever age you happen to be. I have not seen the film yet, but now know exactly what to expect. Thank you.
heatherfuzzball@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Thank you for your kind words. I am, in fact, a 13 year old character. Happily so because older characters who write reviews tend to get a lot more rude response comments. People find it hard to attack a thirteen year old, and embarassing when he writes back and makes them look foolish. So 13 is just the right age for me to be. It is a happy "coincidence".
basilherringboneiii@ - 22.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Well you are certainly the most articulate 13 yr old I've ever read. I would like to see you pursue a career as a film critic, producer, director, whatever... a perfect replacement for the likes of Roger Ebert at the very least. Thank you for sharing your insights. I have not seen this film yet but may yet go for pure entertainment value.
gapsis - 2.3.2010 - age: 50+

Yours is a generous soul, to offer such positive words to another person. Also a developed one -- where others feel a need to attack effort, you find reason to praise it. The unexpected kindness of your words gives me that much more hope with respect to the openness and maturity of the human spirit. BHiii.
basilherringboneiii@ - 3.3.2010 - age: 13-17

Are you not to young to watch this movie?
michjulien@ - 23.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Perhaps you are right. I may be too immature to appreciate the subtleties of the aesthetic. No doubt it will leave me morally deformed as well. Oh well, too late now -- I can't (un)watch it. Thanks for asking...
basilherringboneiii@ - 24.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Who cares what age you are. You're trying to be a pseudo-intellectual critic, and too wordy at that. Either you liked it or didn't. Honestly... !
joliejojo2 - 24.2.2010 - age: 50+

I TOTALLY agree! Either this kid is a very arrogant, yappy (er. Verbose) child, or a very arrogant, yappy opinionated adult. Either way, they sure like to hear themselves speak, and no doubt had a good dictionary/thesaurus open on their toolbar!
fuzzylogic72 - 10.6.2010 - age: 36-49

[...] Can you not tell the difference between an intellectual and a pseudo-intellectual? Or are you so tragically undeveloped as a human being that you level contumely at all you do not understand? [...] Bear in mind, [...] that you cannot elevate your own status by diminishing mine, particularly in what is no more than a fatuous ad hominem attack that, at the same time, attempts to realize "liked it or didn't like it" as the gold standard of critical judgment. Perhaps I could say the same of my review: either you liked it or you didn't like it. Curiously, however, given your stated opinion, your own proposed standard was not enough for you -- you needed malversation, for your own sad reasons; you needed to convert your fear of an intelligent review into an acephalous attack on my character. Well then, if you would have this standard as the standard of judgment, where are your lived grounds for suggesting that it is a standard you, yourself, are willing to keep. Apparently, they don't exist, and so it is ironic that you end your complaint with "Honestly...," for there is nothing honest about your note -- it overflows with the pestiferous insecurity of one who cannot think; yet, nevertheless, reserves the privilege of attacking those who do. And this being so, by definition, you are what Jose Ortega Y Gasset refers to as an "intellectual barbarian". Still, all is not lost, for you might take instruction from your own articulated ignorance. Let me formalize the counsel: First, the fact that you have a small vocabulary and a low level of literacy does not mean that your betters are "wordy" -- indeed, to so accuse reflects back upon you as accuser; makes a public display of your own opacity. With that in mind, may I suggest, given the way you write, that your best strategy for impressing others might simply be keeping your mouth shut and your pen in a box? Please, little man, heed this most generous aureum consilium: learn to keep your opinions where they belong, among the viragos and the trulls who seek authority by randomly attacking those who have it by natural design. BHiii.
basilherringboneiii@ - 24.2.2010 - age: 13-17

LOL Good one com. I am enjoying this review section more than any movie I've seen in a long while. I understand your age position well. It is lost on the puppy who is being critical. I by coincidence have a similar age.
psterl3384@ - 25.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Thanks, Psterl, I could tell from your earlier note that there are affinities connecting us. For some reason, I find that when I write as an older AVATAR, people attack even more. Ultimately, it just gets tiring. By using this AVATAR, however, child cinematic prodigy, Basil Herringbone iii, the whole thing turns into a game for me, so that the huffy respondents become a source of strange pleasure. Sometimes I add subtleties to my writing just to bate them, like "semiotemes" and "cinematic ennui" -- I call it fishing for beligerents. By the way, you would have appreciated the non-edited version of the above retort (passages removed are marked with ellipses [...] In those missing passages, I used a variety of French expressions because there is nothing a person like that writer hates more than being spoken to in more than one language at a time. For some reason, the editors removed them, however, and a little fun went with it. Of course, for me, I really think that it needs to be fun -- a break from being a "real" person. Otherwise why bother. Again, thanks. BHiii.
basilherringboneiii@ - 25.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Well now you have let the cat out of the bag to a degree. Simialry to you, I have a double mask-erade party. I have a double persona in here... for my good cop bad cop reviews. For one I am more of a petulant puppie while the other is more cerebral. I'll even post replies to myself... lol For this site I wish they would put every "first" review outside the box. I would also have one liners to be put in a separate area and call this area District 8, Well I will look for you on other reviews. I saw Shutter last night. It was a good one. Take care Pat.
psterl3384@ - 26.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Yes I wonder how many people are using the same strategies we use for writing reviews. My guess, based on the nature of most reviews (liked it or didn't like it, as the judge of the world suggests above) that most are just writing casual responses and are not "into this" enough to bother role-ing with it. Having said that, I must comment on your natural ability to turn or return a phrase, my favorite being "District 8" which is just subtle enough to be overlooked, the mark of a good pun. As for our secret identities -- they remain well-guarded. I have a saying, grounded in real research, that the best way to hide an idea is to write it down. The printed word, for the contemporary adult, is the bar of soap for a nine year old boy. Thus, this deep in a string of messages, I can assure you that nobody is reading. That is in fact why I am going a little long in this response: if I can get it up to about fifteen lines, you will be the only person who ever sees it. As our culture hero (see below) says to me: zzz. Yawn. I also like your suggested review innovations. I have been thinking about making Basil persistently obnoxious, just to create moral turmoil in the audience. Jules Henry said in a book called PATHWAYS TO MADNESS "There is no absolute punishment for stupidity, in our society, no matter how exuberant and suffocating it might be. But intellect, if expressed without limit, provokes a ferocious attack from society. Maybe it's time for a new avatar to emerge: Francoise de Sante Plume, e perhaps. We could have our own district:) Shutter Island was great, but I could not think of a way to make the review exercise worth doing. You know from the beginning that this film will most likely be resolved with the same logic as The Sixth Sense and The Others (i. e., suddenly, I woke up); but Scorsese actually uses the narrative to gradually convince you that won't happen, and when you finally believe him... WHAM!!! , it does. This is one of the reasons he is so great. Thanks again and best, Basil.
basilherringboneiii@ - 26.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Hi again Francoise De Sante Plume. We'll have to stop meeting like this. I did post a review for Shutter so perhaps we can continue our chats there. I am now left to wonder what you did for a living... not 'do' but did... Your reference to stupidity and Intellect are true. I believe Einstein said that there is a limit to genius but sadly not one for stupidity. I also like the phrase "silence is the fence of wisdom." So as we communicate I will narrow down my guesses as to your career... teaching is too obvious... you're too smart to be "just" a teacher... lol So I would like to see your views on Shutter. I wrote my review but wrote far less than I wanted to. I focused on the visual aspect of the movie. I am sure there is a whole universe of thought on the use of water in this film... I would even guess they used stunt double matches in the building C scenes... Very powerful effect...
psterl3384@ - 26.2.2010 - age: 1-12

Do you go leafing through the pages of a thesaurus often, or just get excited for wordplay. I think you picked the wrong forum to get noticed if journalism is your thing, er or maybe scrabble... either way I find your comments ridiculously pretentious and I feel sorry for you for feeling the need to impersonate a 12 year old to gain attention. My two coppers.
truemania - 5.3.2010 - age: 36-49

Lol He's just playing with you... and you fell for it... you even missed some of the big picture in his words.
buddie_dog@ - 6.3.2010 - age: 1-12

Thanks buddie[...]. Of course, you are right about my Andy-Kaufmanesque strategy, yet you can see how many people willingly take up the role of dupe. I wonder why they feel obliged to attack someone who "thinks he is so smart" -- it's as if they feel a moral duty to protect ignorance, stupidity, or perhaps the status quo. At any event, thanks for responding to this latest culture warrior so that I don't have to bother myself. [...]
basilherringboneiii@ - 8.3.2010 - age: 13-17

I think he needs to find a better game then or better yet maybe stay off the internet for a while and stop embarrasing himself. I missed all the words fortunately, I think I read the first paragraph before the dry heaves set in, and there sure as hell wasn't any picture there I could see.
truemania - 7.3.2010 - age: 26-35

Well said; this reviewer seems to be a very lonely, arrogant, [...]. At least he's not wasting paper and ink when he writes when he writes his benign insights.
fuzzylogic72 - 10.6.2010 - age: 18-25

My Dear True. You can see that I have spent a good amount of time responding already to those like you who need to assault what they cannot understand, and it is getting a little tiring -- there are so many of you out there. Indeed I would prefer just a sentence, but the fact that you needed to write TWICE suggests that you are a genuine fascist, so I will have to be a little more detailed: first, you say that I should not be in this environment if I am seeking attention; yet I have 32 notes posted to my original response -- that seems to belie your sarcastic claim that I get "no attention" (if indeed, that is what I seek), all the more because YOU YOURSELF have TWICE felt the need to chip in what you (I assume because of inflation) are willing to credit as having the worth of two cents. A mature person, when crossing ideas that do not appeal for one reason or another, simply moves on quickly to the next review, or what have you. But you are not that person. You are the sort of person who will read two dozen thoughtless and empty reviews and never stop to write "Why did you bother reviewing if you have nothing to say." No, you don't do that, because you are quite at home with the helplessly illiterate and stupid. Nevertheless, something in you compels you to stop and police a vocabulary that you admit is broader than your own. "Oh, no!" a dim voice calls from the bowel of your brain to the toilet of your tongue," someone is using a word that I don't understand. That must be stopped!" and then you take up a role that has plagued history -- the role of the grand inquisitor -- he who stamps out innovative or original thought. And in that role, you make a week effort to shame me into a smaller performance of myself through sarcasm -- exactly the sort of thing that a junior high school student does. But note, and I have said this to your sort many times in my responses to these sorts of comments, that you say nothing substantive with respect to the film. It's as if you have no interest in the film at all. What you seem to be interested in is your own fear that you might be reading the words of someone who knows more than you do and is not ashamed to reveal it. Oh, now THAT you need to attack. We can't have people thinking, can we? We can't have people forcing us to go to the dictionary. Do you then believe that the few words you have in your head and the few ideas that reside there are sufficient for for the rest of your life. Well, perhaps you are right. Certainly you have enough wits to bag groceries, for example; and that is perhaps all you will ever need. There are others out there with wider aspirations, however, and maybe they don't believe that the most noble moment of their lives was the moment they caught the ball or put the ball in the hole during the big game in high school. Perhaps there is something more for them to do with their lives. They can find ways to grow by typing movie reviews, for example. And perhaps movie reviews are not the only thing they do, but even if they are, what concern is that of yours? You think I should not review in the manner I do? Well I think you should not respond to the reviewer in the manner you do. Which of us is more ignorant, then: the one who wrote what he imagined (perhaps) to be an intelligent review, or imagined (perhaps) to be a provocative review, or the one who needed to jump in with some sort of judgment against an attempt to be provocative or imaginative. Yes, it is odd, my grocery bagging friend, that you would choose to moonlight from your day job as a member of the thought police. Do you walk up to people in coffee shops and write them tickets for having interesting conversations? Do you have surveillance cameras on your front lawn in case someone says something you don't understand while walking by? Do you carry a stop sign and hold it up in the classroom or at work when someone mentions the book he is reading? Have your superiors given you a uniform. You refer to my "age", and I would like to say that you seem a lot younger, but the truth is you don't: you have a form of stupidity and ignorance that can only be gathered over a lifetime: the smug sort. The sort that writes a stranger to attack "big words" rather than going to a dictionary. No, when I read you, I do not read the ignorance of a child, for children always combine their innocence with wonder. They are indeed learning machines. You are in fact, the sort of person who brings an end to childhood wonder. Perhaps then you are a schoolteacher? You stopped growing, if your notes are representative of your full character, as a human being some time ago, and you now seem to feel a need to jump on anyone who has not agreed to do the same. As I mentioned in responding to another of your type, you are what Jose Ortega Y Gasset refers to as an "intellectual barbarian" -- someone who knows no facts with respect to a topic nevertheless reserves full rights with respect to holding an opinion. As for the "thought police", you can look that up in the writings of William Irwin Thompson, but of course you will look up neither. It is unlikely that my words would make you look up anything indeed, but do hope they at least will make you "look up" yourself. You need to take a good look at yourself in the mental mirror, grocery boy, and ask yourself why you are attacking people who know words that you don't. Did you attack the quarterback when he threw the crucial ball in high school, or the forward who "Shoots! He SCORES!" And what does the ability to put a ball in a hole contribute to society? Believe it or not, and I have no time to educate you if you do not, the human race did not get to where it has because people put balls in holes. It got to where it has because all through history, individuals like me (but certainly my betters) have been passionately invested in writing and thinking. They created the shoulder harness that allowed horses to work fields, instead of inefficient oxen, they created the mathematics that allowed all the practical devices in engineering for example, and they created the philosophical understandings that ground, for example, democratic civil life. Everything that you take for granted in life, from your automobile to your refrigerator, is the result of people like me, not like you, trying to think beyond the parameters of what is already there. And you... you are the person throughout history, who pulls their tongues out and roasts them on spits in front of an audience. Well, news flash, grocery boy, those days are gone. No doubt you miss them. So go ahead, live your meaningless life all week and on weekends find a ball and put it in a hole. But consider that you might also draw to a close your infantile policing of the efforts of other human beings, whether you like them or not. Denouncing someone else for having a contribution too stylized for your liking, whether that person is 10 or 100 -- is that really what you want history to leave as your record? Or will you stay forever with the philosophy of uselessness: be normal -- be no one.
basilherringboneiii@ - 9.3.2010 - age: 13-17

7 out of 10 is pretty good for a terrible movie.
wolfrankula - 25.2.2010 - age: 36-49

The score I gave is ironic. It's not easy to make a movie so terrible. It's like saying that it's "superbad". Thanks for asking.
basilherringboneiii@ - 25.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Speaking of falling asleep... usually the movie is longer than the review. Not this time. Yawn. Zzz...
statuerat - 25.2.2010 - age: 36-49

Ahahahahaha yess! I was about to write exactly that lolz.
joe_guitar777 - 6.3.2010 - age: 13-17

Why would you attach your level of literacy and your attention span to Statue-rat? Didn't you read the way he was humiliated by the response of the original reviewer? Oh, of course not -- I forgot: you can't read!
ethics4017@ - 8.3.2010 - age: 1-12

Dear Statuerat. Since you seem to be suffering from a literary attention deficit disorder, I will be brief: 1) the fact that you are but marginally literate (hence unable to follow a nuanced argument) does not mean that I am boring; 2) a more detailed assessment of the kinds of people who send the sort of message you have sent me can be found in my response to Joliejojo above.
basilherringboneiii@ - 25.2.2010 - age: 13-17

Here's a movie that most you will relate to; The 40 year old virgin. Thx for watching.
krazy_kid1@ - 26.2.2010 - age: 1-12

News flash: smug insults work on toilet stall walls, but they carry little weight in a context that allows complete sentences and critical judgment. Your wry wit, which suggests that the fact I am smart means I must also be sexually frustrated, is based on a general assumption made by the ignorant -- that their stupidity makes them better at sex. While it is true that stupidity may lead them into more contexts for sexual activity, which they may ultimately regret, there is no correlation between stupidity and sexual prowess. There are a number of reasons. The first in importance is one that you perhaps have never coonsidered: many women find intelligence an aphrodisiac. Women often say, for example, that they like a man who can make them laugh, and a good sense of humor often accompanies a strong mind (hence the word "wit") Your second error is to overlook the fact that there is at least one brilliant woman for every brilliant man. Your third is to fail to recognize that genius can direct itself to any task, including cultvating a sexual personnae and sexual competence. And if you think that sexual pleasure is not a function of intelligence then you are even weaker than your humor suggests. It is not without reason that we have the saying "the brain is the most erotic organ". If that doesn't make sense to you, please don't ask me to explain it. We are clearly coming from different worlds. Both technically and morally sex is something that also requires study. So no, you will not trump me by implying that my potential for sexual conquest is inhibited by my intelligence. Quite the opposite is commonly the case, which you would know if you knew anything. And thus, I return at the end of this note to the point that I made at the beginning. Slander is meant for the toilet room wall, where it can be performed without risk of retalliation and where it functions as a form of elimination not dissimilar to the other items produced in that context. Sadly for you, then, you are out of your natural element when you write on a web page. You need to go back to your natural habitat, the toilet stall. BHiii.
basilherringboneiii@ - 26.2.2010 - age: 13-17

You are incredibly smart for a 13 year old, you are my new idol.
garrettisown - 28.2.2010 - age: 13-17

I'm sure that you are every bit as articulate as I am, perhaps even a little more subtle. May I, then, express my equal admiration of you?
basilherringboneiii@ - 1.3.2010 - age: 13-17

This thread just gets better and better... Thanks for the chuckles, Basil. I may cut and paste some of your more salient barbs in defending myself. As for your career I am baffled... And I am not a graphic designer, although I have explored interests on the artistic side. After all I am only 9, my paint by number stuff has been exhibited on bathroom walls. "From the bowels of your brain to the toilet of your mouth" A classic! I am still waiting for your Shutter review. Pat.
psterl3384@ - 9.3.2010 - age: 1-12

Yes, I think his writing is a good example of what I mean by an "upper" upper-decker. He is one of the few who have been successful at making me angry. I think it's because he took the secondary step (in his second note) of maligning me, not head on, but to someone else (what I call third-party character assassination) That's not something I admire whenever I see it or hear of it, but particularly, of course, when someone does it with me... in earshot. At any event... I am as baffled about your career. Though not retired, nor near it (13 or otherwise) I am as independent as one can possibly be and (here's a bizarre hint) love what I do. Shutter Island will be tricky for me as I feel you have taken the brass ring on that one. I'm looking at writing from the perspective of Francoise de Sant Plume or Francoise Saint Tableau Noire's perspective on the movie "The Crazy's". Now that was an experience. BHiii.
basilherringboneiii@ - 10.3.2010 - age: 13-17

[ATTENTION: This comment reveals content of the movie.]
When you say a bizarre hint then I am intrigued. You have a career that on the surface is an oxymoron to your value system. Regardless of your employ, you would always be an independent soul... Your sense of morality, your command of the language has me sliding into the legal system. That is a lateral slide of course... lol. It is rare, unless you are a dog, to love everything you do. I am thrown off by your intellect, and due to my own biases I would discard carpentry etc. even though these careers are lush with reward... I'll wait for another clue Scooby. Now my question to you about Shutter: do you feel that DiCaprio had reverted back to form, or was he making a cogni

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:	1-12	13-17	18-25	26-35	36-49	50+	Total
Men: Votes:	10 1	7.1 10	5.6 12	6.6 19	6.4 30	6.1 8	6.4 81
Women: Votes:	- 0	6.6 5	6 13	4.7 16	5.7 3	7 4	5.6 41
Total: Votes:	10 1	6.9 15	5.8 25	5.7 36	6.2 35	6.4 12	6 128
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.

Select options, and click to filter reviews
Age:	1-12	13-17	18-25	26-35	36-49	50+
Sex:	Male	Female

Title	Vote
The Dark Knight	10/10
We Bought a Zoo	9/10
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows	9/10
The Hangover	9/10
The Blood Diamond	9/10
The King's Speech	9/10
Inception	9/10
Shutter Island	9/10
Iron Man 2	9/10
Sherlock Holmes	9/10
500 Days of Summer	9/10
Inglourious Basterds	9/10
The Happening	9/10
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford	9/10
We Own the Night	9/10
Mission: Impossible: Ghost Protocol	8/10
Moneyball	8/10
Contagion	8/10
Crazy, Stupid, Love.	8/10
Rise of the Planet of the Apes	8/10
Horrible Bosses	8/10
The Lincoln Lawyer	8/10
Limitless	8/10
Get Him to the Greek	8/10
The Social Network	8/10
The Switch	8/10
Remember Me	8/10
The Hurt Locker	8/10
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time	8/10
Law Abiding Citizen	8/10
Robin Hood	8/10
Valkyrie	8/10
Avatar	8/10
The Book of Eli	8/10
Love Happens	8/10
Iron Man	8/10
30 Days of Night	8/10
3:10 to Yuma	8/10
Eastern Promises	8/10
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close	7/10
Captain America: The First Avenger	7/10
Thor	7/10
Fright Night	7/10
Source Code	7/10
Unknown	7/10
Super 8	7/10
The Hangover Part II	7/10
The Adjustment Bureau	7/10
Black Swan	7/10
True Grit	7/10
Hereafter	7/10
The Town	7/10
Dinner for Schmucks	7/10
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse	7/10
Crazy Heart	7/10
Green Zone	7/10
The Crazies	7/10
The Wolfman	7/10
Orphan	7/10
It's Complicated	7/10
The International	7/10
Daybreakers	7/10
Terminator Salvation	7/10
Clash of the Titans	7/10
Edge of Darkness	7/10
The Lovely Bones	7/10
Whiteout	7/10
Resident Evil: Extinction	7/10
The Thing	6/10
The Rite	6/10
Battle: Los Angeles	6/10
Resident Evil: Afterlife	6/10
Love and Other Drugs	6/10
Predators	6/10
Valentine's Day	6/10
2012	6/10
Date Night	6/10
District 9	6/10
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull	6/10
The Change-Up	5/10
The Tree of Life	5/10
Splice	5/10
Jonah Hex	5/10
Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps	5/10
A Nightmare on Elm Street	5/10
Repo Men	5/10
Brooklyn's Finest	5/10
Legion	5/10
The Road	5/10
Priest	4/10
No Strings Attached	4/10
Skyline	4/10
The Last Airbender	4/10
Brüno	3/10

Title	Vote
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire	10/10
Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith	9/10
The Wolfman	8/10
The Incredible Hulk	8/10
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World	7/10
Watchmen	7/10
Spider-Man 3	5/10
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen	3/10
Dragonball: Evolution	1/10
Twilight	1/10

Title	Vote
Dinner for Schmucks	10/10
Halloween II	10/10
Year One	10/10
The Stepfather	10/10
I Am Legend	10/10
Paranormal Activity	10/10
The Day the Earth Stood Still	10/10
The Blind Side	10/10
The Road	10/10
The Karate Kid	10/10
The A-Team	10/10
Splice	10/10
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time	10/10
Iron Man 2	10/10
South Park: Bigger Longer & Uncut	10/10
The Crazies	10/10
Predators	9/10
Valentine's Day	9/10
Law Abiding Citizen	9/10
Clash of the Titans	9/10
The Other Guys	8/10
The Twilight Saga: New Moon	8/10
Legion	8/10
The Book of Eli	7/10
Avatar	5/10
The Last Airbender	3/10
The Wolfman	1/10

Home

Top 10

Trailers

Playing

Upcoming

Theatres

Movies

DVD

The Wolfman

Movie

Pictures

Reviews

128 user reviews

6.0

Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 128)

Title	Vote
The Lion King	10/10
Amistad	10/10
The Shawshank Redemption	10/10
Mulan	9/10
Beauty and The Beast	9/10
The Color Purple	9/10
Tangled	9/10
Män som hatar kvinnor	9/10
Avatar	9/10
Braveheart	9/10
American Gangster	9/10
300	9/10
Batman Begins	9/10
Sin City	9/10
Fahrenheit 9/11	9/10
Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows	8/10
Courageous	8/10
The Help	8/10
Rise of the Planet of the Apes	8/10
Akmareul boatda	8/10
El secreto de sus ojos	8/10
How to Train Your Dragon	8/10
The Blind Side	8/10
Law Abiding Citizen	8/10
The Hurt Locker	8/10
Fireproof	8/10
Star Trek	8/10
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button	8/10
Slumdog Millionaire	8/10
Changeling	8/10
Taken	8/10
Notorious	8/10
The Dark Knight	8/10
Iron Man	8/10
The Bourne Ultimatum	8/10
Transformers	8/10
Stomp the Yard	8/10
The Prestige	8/10
The Departed	8/10
Huo Yuan Jia	8/10
The Illusionist	8/10
V for Vendetta	8/10
Final Destination 3	8/10
Underworld: Evolution	8/10
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe	8/10
Saw II	8/10
The Forgotten	8/10
The Thing	7/10
Captain America: The First Avenger	7/10
X-Men: First Class	7/10
Love and Other Drugs	7/10
Thor	7/10
Source Code	7/10
Limitless	7/10
The Lincoln Lawyer	7/10
The Mechanic	7/10
Middle Men	7/10
The Fighter	7/10
True Grit	7/10
Black Swan	7/10
Luftslottet som sprängdes	7/10
Paranormal Activity 2	7/10
Devil	7/10
The Ghost Writer	7/10
The Expendables	7/10
Kick-Ass	7/10
Scott Pilgrim vs. the World	7/10
Despicable Me	7/10
Inception	7/10
Predators	7/10
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse	7/10
The Karate Kid	7/10
Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time	7/10
An Education	7/10
Iron Man 2	7/10
Clash of the Titans	7/10
Capitalism: A Love Story	7/10
The Cove	7/10
Precious	7/10
17 Again	7/10
Invictus	7/10
The Twilight Saga: New Moon	7/10
The Ugly Truth	7/10
Drag Me to Hell	7/10
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra	7/10
The Proposal	7/10
The Hangover	7/10
Angels & Demons	7/10
X-Men Origins: Wolverine	7/10
I Love You, Man	7/10
Watchmen	7/10
Twilight	7/10
Saw V	7/10
Eagle Eye	7/10
Traitor	7/10
National Treasure: Book of Secrets	7/10
Wall-E	7/10
Mamma Mia!	7/10
Good Luck Chuck	7/10
Charlie Wilson's War	7/10
Wanted	7/10
The Forbidden Kingdom	7/10
The Incredible Hulk	7/10
Penelope	7/10
Enchanted	7/10
The Game Plan	7/10
Step Up 2 the Streets	7/10
Juno	7/10
Michael Clayton	7/10
Rambo	7/10
No Country for Old Men	7/10
3:10 to Yuma	7/10
Hitman	7/10
Resident Evil: Extinction	7/10
Superbad	7/10
Fracture	7/10
Halloween	7/10
Shoot 'Em Up	7/10
28 Weeks Later...	7/10
1408	7/10
Live Free or Die Hard	7/10
Notes on a Scandal	7/10
Factory Girl	7/10
Stranger Than Fiction	7/10
Apocalypto	7/10
Man cheng jin dai huang jin jia	7/10
Shooter	7/10
The Pursuit of Happyness	7/10
The Queen	7/10
Grindhouse	7/10
Premonition	7/10
Babel	7/10
Black Snake Moan	7/10
The Blood Diamond	7/10
The Guardian	7/10
Gridiron Gang	7/10
Invincible	7/10
Tom yum goong	7/10
World Trade Center	7/10
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest	7/10
John Tucker Must Die	7/10
Monster House	7/10
The Descent	7/10
Miami Vice	7/10
Superman Returns	7/10
The Da Vinci Code	7/10
Poseidon	7/10
Mission: Impossible 3	7/10
Silent Hill	7/10
16 Blocks	7/10
Roll Bounce	7/10
Contraband	6/10
Immortals	6/10
Bridesmaids	6/10
Real Steel	6/10
No Strings Attached	6/10
Knight and Day	6/10
Scream 4	6/10
Hanna	6/10
Fair Game	6/10
The Next Three Days	6/10
127 Hours	6/10
The Adjustment Bureau	6/10
Unknown	6/10
Unstoppable	6/10
You Again	6/10
Catfish	6/10
Saw 3D	6/10
I Spit on Your Grave	6/10
Life as We Know It	6/10
Faster	6/10
Easy A	6/10
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1	6/10
Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps	6/10
Harry Brown	6/10
Resident Evil: Afterlife	6/10
Machete	6/10
Date Night	6/10
Salt	6/10
The Sorcerer's Apprentice	6/10
The Fantastic Mr. Fox	6/10
Grown Ups	6/10
The Crazies	6/10
The Wolfman	6/10
The A-Team	6/10
Get Him to the Greek	6/10
Robin Hood	6/10
Edge of Darkness	6/10
Daybreakers	6/10
The Road	6/10
Why Did I Get Married Too	6/10
Brooklyn's Finest	6/10
Shutter Island	6/10
Pandorum	6/10
Paranormal Activity	6/10
Couples Retreat	6/10
The Surrogates	6/10
Inglourious Basterds	6/10
Love Happens	6/10
I Can Do Bad All by Myself	6/10
The Final Destination	6/10
Knowing	6/10
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen	6/10
The Taking of Pelham 123	6/10
Terminator Salvation	6/10
The House Bunny	6/10
Appaloosa	6/10
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian	6/10
Mirrors	6/10
The Other Boleyn Girl	6/10
Righteous Kill	6/10
You Don't Mess with the Zohan	6/10
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor	6/10
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull	6/10
The Invasion	6/10
No Reservations	6/10
How She Move	6/10
Hancock	6/10
Untraceable	6/10
Street Kings	6/10
August Rush	6/10
The Eye	6/10
88 Minutes	6/10
Run Fatboy Run	6/10
Rendition	6/10
The Mist	6/10
We Own the Night	6/10
Aliens vs. Predator: Requiem	6/10
I Am Legend	6/10
Saw IV	6/10
Disturbia	6/10
Illegal Tender	6/10
Rush Hour 3	6/10
Sicko	6/10
Breach	6/10
The Reaping	6/10
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer	6/10
Next	6/10
The Invisible	6/10
The Condemned	6/10
Shrek the Third	6/10
Slow Burn	6/10
Hannibal Rising	6/10
The Number 23	6/10
I Think I Love My Wife	6/10
Ghost Rider	6/10
Rocky Balboa	6/10
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning	6/10
Marie Antoinette	6/10
The Covenant	6/10
Mistress of Spices	6/10
X-Men 3: The Last Stand	6/10
The Sentinel	6/10
Inside Man	6/10
The Legend of Zorro	6/10
Underworld: Awakening	5/10
Paranormal Activity 3	5/10
Insidious	5/10
Battle: Los Angeles	5/10
Case 39	5/10
The Unborn	5/10
Stone	5/10
Killers	5/10
From Paris with Love	5/10
The Back-Up Plan	5/10
Jennifer's Body	5/10
Repo Men	5/10
A Nightmare on Elm Street	5/10
Gamer	5/10
The Book of Eli	5/10
Friday the 13th	5/10
2012	5/10
Horsemen	5/10
Che	5/10
Underworld: Rise of the Lycans	5/10
The Day the Earth Stood Still	5/10
Quarantine	5/10
Feel the Noise	5/10
The Ruins	5/10
Be Kind Rewind	5/10
Lars and the Real Girl	5/10
Why Did I Get Married?	5/10
Vantage Point	5/10
Jumper	5/10
The Fountain	5/10
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford	5/10
Mr. Woodcock	5/10
Zodiac	5/10
Perfume: The Story of a Murderer	5/10
30 Days of Night	5/10
Captivity	5/10
Rise: Blood Hunter	5/10
The Astronaut Farmer	5/10
Hostel: Part II	5/10
Spider-Man 3	5/10
The Marine	5/10
Step Up	5/10
Crank	5/10
Clerks II	5/10
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby	5/10
Basic Instinct 2	5/10
Freedomland	5/10
King Kong	5/10
Blade: Trinity	5/10
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines	5/10
Drive Angry	4/10
Red Riding Hood	4/10
My Soul to Take	4/10
The Killer Inside Me	4/10
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant	4/10
The Last Exorcism	4/10
Vampires Suck	4/10
Piranha 3D	4/10
The Last Airbender	4/10
Did You Hear About the Morgans?	4/10
The Invention of Lying	4/10
Zombieland	4/10
Max Payne	4/10
Babylon A.D.	4/10
Silk	4/10
First Sunday	4/10
Shutter	4/10
I Know Who Killed Me	4/10
Bug	4/10
Skinwalkers	4/10
Vacancy	4/10
Scary Movie 4	4/10
Ultraviolet	4/10
Block Party	4/10
When a Stranger Calls	4/10
Haywire	3/10
Due Date	3/10
Halloween II	3/10
Death at a Funeral	3/10
Prom Night	3/10
The Spirit	3/10
The Scorpion King 2: Rise of A Warrior	3/10
One Missed Call	3/10
Doomsday	3/10
Boarding Gate	3/10
Pathfinder	3/10
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End	3/10
Date Movie	3/10
Alexander	3/10
The Grudge 2	2/10

Title	Vote
Hobo with a Shotgun	10/10
The Trotsky	9/10
Alice in Wonderland	9/10
Splice	7/10
Iron Man 2	6/10
The Wolfman	2/10

Title	Vote
The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn	10/10
The Way	8/10
The Wolfman	8/10
Green Zone	6/10

Title	Vote
Fast Five	10/10
The Expendables	10/10
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides	1/10

Title	Vote
Bend It Like Beckham	10/10
Million Dollar Baby	10/10
Saving Private Ryan	10/10
Sex Drive	10/10
Up	10/10
300	10/10
Titanic	10/10
Avatar	10/10
Inglourious Basterds	10/10
Underworld: Rise of the Lycans	10/10
Capitalism: A Love Story	9/10
I Am Legend	9/10
27 Dresses	9/10
Jennifer's Body	9/10
Monsters vs. Aliens	9/10
Underworld	9/10
Kung Fu Panda	9/10
Passchendaele	9/10
V for Vendetta	9/10
Pearl Harbor	9/10
How to Train Your Dragon	9/10
Cloverfield	9/10
Shoot 'Em Up	9/10
Atonement	9/10
Underworld: Evolution	9/10
Wanted	9/10
Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs	9/10
The Bounty Hunter	9/10
When in Rome	9/10
From Paris with Love	9/10
Trailer Park Boys: Countdown to Liquor Day	9/10
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen	9/10
The Hangover	9/10
The Other Guys	8/10
Salt	8/10
Disturbia	8/10
Miss March	8/10
I, Robot	8/10
War of the Worlds	8/10
Clash of the Titans	8/10
Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel	8/10
Zack and Miri Make a Porno	8/10
Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous	8/10
Taken	8/10
Der Untergang	8/10
The Last King of Scotland	8/10
Hot Tub Time Machine	8/10
Flyboys	8/10
The Invention of Lying	8/10
Elizabethtown	8/10
Transformers	8/10
Tropic Thunder	8/10
The Men Who Stare at Goats	8/10
Valkyrie	8/10
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull	8/10
The Proposal	8/10
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button	8/10
The Princess and the Frog	8/10
She's Out of My League	8/10
The Crazies	8/10
Dinner for Schmucks	7/10
Kick-Ass	7/10
The Nanny Diaries	7/10
One Missed Call	7/10
Resident Evil: Extinction	7/10
Doomsday	7/10
The Matrix Reloaded	7/10
Hidalgo	7/10
Shooter	7/10
I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry	7/10
X-Men Origins: Wolverine	7/10
Whiteout	7/10
The Spy Next Door	7/10
The Book of Eli	7/10
Old Dogs	7/10
2012	7/10
The Wolfman	7/10
Gamer	6/10
Death Race	6/10
Australia	6/10
The Life of David Gale	6/10
A Perfect Getaway	6/10
You Don't Mess with the Zohan	6/10
Ninja Assassin	6/10
The Adventures of Pluto Nash	6/10
Shutter Island	6/10
88 Minutes	5/10
Did You Hear About the Morgans?	5/10
500 Days of Summer	4/10
Slumdog Millionaire	4/10
Watchmen	3/10
District 9	1/10
The Heartbreak Kid	1/10

Title	Vote
Stark Raving Black	10/10
Man on a Ledge	10/10
Colombiana	10/10
Rise of the Planet of the Apes	10/10
X-Men: First Class	10/10
Bridesmaids	10/10
Thor	10/10
Fast Five	10/10
Tangled	10/10
Unknown	10/10
No Strings Attached	10/10
Dirty Dancing	10/10
The Twilight Saga: Eclipse	10/10
Date Night	10/10
How to Train Your Dragon	10/10
Shutter Island	10/10
The Twilight Saga: New Moon	10/10
Law Abiding Citizen	10/10
All About Steve	10/10
The Hangover	10/10
Dostana	10/10
Confessions of a Shopaholic	10/10
Pink Panther 2	10/10
Taken	10/10
Speed 1	10/10
Transporter 3	10/10
Yes Man	10/10
Awake	10/10
Made of Honor	10/10
21	10/10
You Don't Mess with the Zohan	10/10
What Happens in Vegas	10/10
Sex and the City	10/10
27 Dresses	10/10
Mission: Impossible: Ghost Protocol	9/10
Contagion	9/10
Crazy, Stupid, Love.	9/10
The Hangover Part II	9/10
You Again	9/10
Source Code	9/10
Species	9/10
Avatar	9/10
August Rush	9/10
Red Riding Hood	9/10
Just Go with It	9/10
The Adjustment Bureau	9/10
The Green Hornet	9/10
Black Swan	9/10
Dinner for Schmucks	9/10
Chloe	9/10
Dear John	9/10
It's Complicated	9/10
A Christmas Carol	9/10
The Ugly Truth	9/10
Coraline	9/10
Slumdog Millionaire	9/10
Four Christmases	9/10
Kung Fu Panda	9/10
Contraband	8/10
Puss in Boots	8/10
Scream 4	8/10
Whiteout	8/10
Splice	8/10
Life as We Know It	8/10
Case 39	8/10
The Karate Kid	8/10
Knight and Day	8/10
Iron Man 2	8/10
Leap Year	8/10
The Blind Side	8/10
The Box	8/10
X-Men Origins: Wolverine	8/10
He's Just Not That Into You	8/10
Bedtime Stories	8/10
Definitely, Maybe	8/10
One for the Money	7/10
What's Your Number?	7/10
Horrible Bosses	7/10
Water for Elephants	7/10
Hanna	7/10
Sex and the City 2	7/10
The Expendables	7/10
Letters to Juliet	7/10
The Bounty Hunter	7/10
Planet 51	7/10
Bella	7/10
Forgetting Sarah Marshall	7/10
The Feast of Love	7/10
From Prada to Nada	6/10
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1	6/10
Jack and Jill	6/10
Johnny English Reborn	6/10
The Three Musketeers	6/10
Winnie the Pooh	6/10
Monte Carlo	6/10
Green Lantern	6/10
Bad Teacher	6/10
Rio	6/10
Something Borrowed	6/10
The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift	6/10
Morning Glory	6/10
Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps	6/10
Grown Ups	6/10
The A-Team	6/10
The Wolfman	6/10
Sherlock Holmes	6/10
District 9	6/10
I Love You, Man	6/10
New in Town	6/10
Jumper	6/10
Midnight in Paris	5/10
Kung Fu Panda 2	5/10
How Do You Know	5/10
Sucker Punch	5/10
Hereafter	5/10
Eat Pray Love	5/10
The Back-Up Plan	5/10
Furry Vengeance	5/10
Love Happens	5/10
Fast & Furious	5/10
The Bank Job	5/10
Baby Mama	5/10
Alice in Wonderland	4/10
Haywire	3/10
127 Hours	3/10
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans	3/10
Duplicity	3/10
Step Up 2 the Streets	3/10
Your Highness	2/10
Easy A	2/10
G-Force	2/10
The Love Guru	2/10
The Incredible Hulk	2/10
Friends with Benefits	1/10
The Happening	1/10
The Mist	1/10

Title	Vote
Fiddler on the Roof	10/10
Lawrence Of Arabia	10/10
The Magnificent Seven	10/10
Avatar	10/10
Iron Monkey	10/10
The Legend Of Drunken Master	10/10
Radio Days	10/10
Alias	10/10
American Graffiti	10/10
The Day the Earth Stood Still	10/10
The Thief of Bagdad	10/10
Once Upon A Time In America	10/10
Spartacus	10/10
A Man for All Seasons	9/10
Cadillac Records	9/10
Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith	9/10
The War of the Worlds	9/10
A Few Good Men	9/10
Star Trek	9/10
Salt	9/10
The Adventures of Robin Hood	9/10
Captains Courageous	9/10
10	9/10
The Big Sleep	9/10
Bedazzled	9/10
MacGyver	8/10
Deep Rising	8/10
Basic Instinct	8/10
The Thing	8/10
Starship Troopers	8/10
Stargate	8/10
Billion Dollar Brain	8/10
The Man Who Fell to Earth	7/10
Wanted: Dead or Alive	7/10
The Sheltering Sky	7/10
Sid And Nancy	7/10
The Wolfman	7/10
American Gigolo	7/10
Beach Blanket Bingo	7/10
20,000 Leagues Under The Sea	7/10
Stardust Memories	7/10
Splendor in the Grass	7/10
Barbarella	6/10
Sphere	5/10
Inception	3/10

Title	Vote
Spider-Man 2	9/10
Inglourious Basterds	8/10
The Twilight Saga: New Moon	7/10
Avatar	7/10
Paranormal Activity	7/10
The Wolfman	6/10
Dear John	2/10
White Noise	2/10

Title	Vote
Hugo	10/10
Hobo with a Shotgun	10/10
Jackass 3D	10/10
The Town	10/10
Salt	10/10
The Wolfman	10/10
The Final Destination	10/10
The Hangover	10/10
X-Men Origins: Wolverine	10/10
Gran Torino	10/10
Sunshine	10/10
Spider-Man 3	10/10
Jackass: Number Two	10/10
Piranha 3D	9/10
The Book of Eli	9/10
Avatar	9/10
Law Abiding Citizen	9/10
Zombieland	9/10
District 9	9/10
The Time Traveler's Wife	9/10
Crank 2: High Voltage	9/10
Slumdog Millionaire	9/10
Eagle Eye	9/10
Death Race	9/10
Iron Man	9/10
Blades of Glory	9/10
Live Free or Die Hard	9/10
The Departed	9/10
Night at the Museum	9/10
Apocalypto	9/10
The Blood Diamond	9/10
The Prestige	9/10
Hollywoodland	9/10
Chronicle	8/10
Rise of the Planet of the Apes	8/10
X-Men: First Class	8/10
Limitless	8/10
The Next Three Days	8/10
Due Date	8/10
Machete	8/10
The Invention of Lying	8/10
Year One	8/10
Knowing	8/10
You Don't Mess with the Zohan	8/10
The Dark Knight	8/10
American Gangster	8/10
The Brave One	8/10
Halloween	8/10
The Simpsons Movie	8/10
Borat	8/10
Children of Men	8/10
Man of the Year	8/10
Snakes on a Plane	8/10
Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby	8/10
Click	8/10
Mission: Impossible: Ghost Protocol	7/10
Straw Dogs	7/10
Bridesmaids	7/10
Fast Five	7/10
Just Go with It	7/10
Unstoppable	7/10
The Other Guys	7/10
Date Night	7/10
Shutter Island	7/10
All About Steve	7/10
Drag Me to Hell	7/10
Star Trek	7/10
Fast & Furious	7/10
The Last House on the Left	7/10
Superhero Movie	7/10
28 Weeks Later...	7/10
Stranger Than Fiction	7/10
The Queen	7/10
Turistas	7/10
Hostel: Part II	7/10
The Hills Have Eyes 2	7/10
The Pursuit of Happyness	7/10
Nacho Libre	7/10
Source Code	6/10
Case 39	6/10
Devil	6/10
Predators	6/10
Grown Ups	6/10
The Stepfather	6/10
Inglourious Basterds	6/10
Angels & Demons	6/10
Taken	6/10
Tropic Thunder	6/10
Hellboy 2: The Golden Army	6/10
Get Smart	6/10
The Mist	6/10
Dan in Real Life	6/10
Shoot 'Em Up	6/10
The Hitcher	6/10
Clerks II	6/10
Tower Heist	5/10
Horrible Bosses	5/10
MacGruber	5/10
The Crazies	5/10
12 Rounds	5/10
Four Christmases	5/10
Max Payne	5/10
Resident Evil: Extinction	5/10
1408	5/10
Rocky Balboa	5/10
See No Evil	5/10
Super 8	4/10
The Adjustment Bureau	4/10
The Dilemma	4/10
RED	4/10
The Men Who Stare at Goats	4/10
The Surrogates	4/10
Halloween II	4/10
Night at the Museum 2: Battle of the Smithsonian	4/10
Terminator Salvation	4/10
No Country for Old Men	4/10
Epic Movie	4/10
Déjà Vu	4/10
Scary Movie 4	4/10
Contagion	3/10
Insidious	3/10
Inception	3/10
Edge of Darkness	3/10
The Proposal	3/10
Quantum of Solace	3/10
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull	3/10
I Am Legend	3/10
Music and Lyrics	3/10
Disturbia	3/10
Smokin' Aces	3/10
Superman Returns	3/10
Real Steel	2/10
TRON: Legacy	2/10
Get Him to the Greek	2/10
From Paris with Love	2/10
A Perfect Getaway	2/10
The X-Files: I Want to Believe	2/10
The Happening	2/10
The Holiday	2/10
The Number 23	2/10
Black Christmas	2/10
The Da Vinci Code	2/10
Your Highness	1/10
Paranormal Activity	1/10
Disaster Movie	1/10
Hitman	1/10

Title	Vote
War Horse	9/10
Up in the Air	9/10
Big Miracle	8/10
Contraband	8/10
The Runaways	8/10
The Wolfman	8/10
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 1	7/10
J. Edgar	7/10
Bad Teacher	6/10

Title	Vote
Toy Story 3	10/10
Avatar	10/10
Shrek Forever After	9/10
Precious	8/10
Percy Jackson & the Olympians: The Lightning Thief	8/10
Robin Hood	7/10
The Wolfman	7/10
Sherlock Holmes	7/10
Sex and the City 2	6/10
Step Brothers	6/10
The Last Airbender	1/10